Prediction of Rafael Jodar [686th] vs Rudy Quan [666th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L W W L W
Form
W L W W W L L L W LHead-To-Head: Jodar 0 - 0 Quan
| Jodar | Stats | Quan |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (3-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (1-2) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 686 | Ranking | 666 |
| 686 | Highest Rank | 666 |
| 18 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (11-10) | Career Total W/L | 59% (32-22) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $14,730 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rafael Jodar vs Rudy Quan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jodar 0 - 0 Quan
Editorial Prediction:
Rafael Jodar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Rafael Jodar
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
12
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Rafael Jodar
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Stefan Kozlov
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
98)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Rafael Jodar
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 2-6 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Rudy Quan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Rudy Quan
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Dostanic
Player
Rudy Quan
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Rudy Quan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Rudy Quan
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Guy Den Ouden
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Keegan Smith
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Patrick Zahraj
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (11/10) | Win/Loss | 59% (32/22) |
| 50% (25/25) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (70/56) |
| 49% (232/243) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (628/589) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 45 | Aces Total | 21 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 48 | Total Double Faults | 117 |
| 1:35:6 | Average Match Time | 1:9:21 |
| 335 | Average Opponent Rank | 284.28 |
| 58% (785/1355) | 1st Serve % | 70% (1663/2384) |
| 65% (513/785) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (967/1663) |
| 47% (266/570) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (315/721) |
| 43% (59/137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (148/299) |
| 41% (529/1288) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1078/2322) |
| 52% (11/21) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (32/54) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (7/10) |
| 63% (5/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (12/18) |
| 82% (11/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (28/26) |
| 18% (11/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (28/2) |
| 20% (10/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (26/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
